Strayer PAD 520 All
Discussions Questions
IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work
then Click The Link Below For Instant Down Load
Strayer PAD 520 All Discussions Questions -
Latest
week 1 discussion 1
"The Process of Analysis ? Diagrams and
Trees" Please respond to the following:
- From
the case study, Case 1.3, compare and contrast the benefits of the
influence diagram and decision tree displayed in Figure C1.3. Explain why
these two problem representations are good examples of descriptive and
normative decision theory.
- Refer
to your first discussion’s answer and analyze the differences between
monitoring and evaluation in policy analysis. Provide at least one example
to support your response.
week 1 diss 2
"The Process of Analysis ? Critical
Thinking" Please respond to the following:
- From
the case studies, Case 1.1 and Case 1.2, discuss the strengths and
limitations of using multiple triangulation, also called critical
multiplism. Provide at least one example to support your answer.
- Propose
two reasons argumentation mapping can help a policy maker become a
critical thinker. Provide at least two examples to support your response.
week 2 diss 1
Developing Policy Arguments and Debate"
Please respond to the following:
- Develop
a policy argument or claim that is definitive, designative, evaluative,
and advocative, using one of these terms: (a) crime, (b) pollution, (c)
terrorism, (d) quality of life, (e) global warming, (f) fiscal crisis, (g)
human rights, and (h) unemployment.
- Convert
the argument in the first discussion into a policy debate by providing an
objection and a rebuttal. Explain if and why the qualifier changed after
introducing an objection and rebuttal. If the qualifier did not change,
explain why it did not change.
week 2 diss 2
"Policy Arguments" Please respond to
the following:
- From
the case study, Case 8.1, use the argument mapping procedures presented in
the chapter and provide two pros and two cons (or strengths and weaknesses)
of the recommendation that the United States should NOT intervene in the
Balkans.
- From
the e-Activity, discuss two different modes of argument and examples of
formal and informal fallacies. Provide the source(s) of the modes of
arguments and fallacies you identified.
week 3
"Policy-Making Process" Please
respond to the following:
- Take
a position in support of one of the two statements:
·
- (a)
Policy analysts should research the issues and determine the fundamental
causes of social problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness and
then recommend solutions.
- (b)
Policy analysts should develop implementable policies to address social
problems such as crime, poverty, or homelessness without research to
determine the cause(s). Support your position with examples or evidence.
- From
the case study, Case 2.1, debate two pros and two cons of evidence-based
policy making, by considering the concepts of “ technocratic guidance” and
“technocratic counsel.”
week 3 diss 2
Analysis in Practice" Please respond to
the following:
- From
the e-Activity, provide two reasons and / or examples of what makes the
paper or report you selected of high technical quality. Provide the
source(s) of the article you selected.
- From
the e-Activity, provide two examples from the same article that illustrate
how the analysis changes the status quo.
WEEK 4 DISS 1
"Structuring the
Problem" Please respond to the following:
- Examine
Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Choose one (1) policy issue
in the U.S. and generate a list of at least five (5) stakeholders who
affect or are affected by problems in the issue area. Next, apply the
procedures for a stakeholder analysis. Note: Refer to page 111 in the text
for a step-by-step process.
- From
the e-Activity, provide at least two examples from the article and from
your own experience of ways that worldviews, ideologies, and popular myths
may have shaped the formulation of a specific problem or issue. Provide
the source(s) of the paper or report you selected.
WEEK 4 DISS 2
"Models and Structuring" Please
respond to the following:
- Review
Question 6 and select one of the ill-structured problems taken from the
journal Policy Analysis (now the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Under the title “Department of Unintended Consequences”. Analyze the
problem; then, provide an example on how classification analysis,
hierarchy analysis, and synectics might be used to structure the problem
you selected. Identify the problem you selected in your discussion with
one of the following key phrases: (a) Egyptian agriculture, (b) ecologists
and field mice, (c) San Francisco’s North Beach parking.
- From
the case study, Case 3.1, analyze the problem; then, provide two key
differences in data collection represented by the process of group
interviewing and content analysis. Take a position on which data
collection method is better. Provide at least two reasons for your
position.
WEEK 5 DISS 1
"Approaches to Forecasting Policy
Outcomes" Please respond to the following:
- Explain
at least two ways institutional, temporal, and historical contexts of
forecasts affect their accuracy.
- Describe
a real or hypothetical situation that requires someone to make a policy
decision. Then, select one of the three approaches to forecasting to
apply: extrapolative, theoretical, or judgmental. Provide at least two
reasons for your selection of the forecasting approach.
WEEK 5 DISS 2
"Types of Forecasting" Please
respond to the following:
- Debate
It: Take a position for or against this statement: It is better to be
approximately right than exactly wrong. Provide at least two reasons and
one hypothetical example to support your position.
- From
the case study, Case 4.2, and Box 4.1, analyze the history of MARTA and
data receipts. Then, recommend an equitable policy for the generation of
sufficient revenue to maintain and expand the system. Provide at least two
reasons to support your proposal. Hypothesize at least two objections to
the policy.
WEEK 6 DISS 1
"Prescribing Preferred Policies"
Please respond to the following:
- Explain
two of the six criteria for policy prescription, (a) effectiveness, (b)
efficiency, (c) adequacy, (d) equity, (e) responsiveness, and (f)
appropriateness. Then, describe a real or hypothetical public policy issue
and select which of the two criteria you believe would be the most
beneficial to use in deciding a policy. Provide at least two reasons for
your selection.
- Debate
It: Take a position for or against the following statement: Rational
choice is not possible. Discuss how different types of rationality are
related to different criteria for prescription. Provide at least two
reasons and two examples to support your response.
WEEK 6 DISS 2
"Saving Lives by Prescribing
Policies" Please respond to the following:
- From
the case studies, Case 1.1 and Case 5.1, explain two of the major issues.
Then, analyze the assumptions that govern safe driving and discuss whether
some assumptions are more reasonable than others. Support your position
with at least two reasons and one example.
- From
the case studies, Case 1.1 and Case 5.1, recommend the best ways to
estimate the value of time and the cost of a gallon of gasoline. Support
your position with at least two reasons and one example.
WEEK 7 DISS 1
"Monitoring Observed Policy
Outcomes" Please respond to the following:
- Discuss
the relationship between ill-structured problems and approaches to
monitoring. Then, describe a real or hypothetical problem and recommend at
least one effective way to monitor the policy outcomes. Support your
position.
- Use
at least two threats to validity and develop a rebuttal to two of the
following statements: (a) The greater the cost of an alternative, the less
likely it is that the alternative will be pursued. (b) The enforcement of
the maximum speed limit of 55 mph increases the costs of exceeding the
speed limit. (c) The mileage death rate fell from 4.3 to 3.6 deaths per
100 million miles after the implementation of the 55-mph speed limit.
(Refer to Figure 6.13 before responding.)
WEEK 7 DISS 2
"Monitoring through Experimentation"
Please respond to the following:
- Assume
you are the program chair of an employment program for students who did
not graduate high school but earned a GED (Government Equivalency Degree).
You have limited resources and want to determine the factors that ensure
students succeed in their jobs. Explain to the program director how the
“tiebreaking” experiment might allow the program to uncover that
information.
- Develop
a hypothetical example, not described in the textbook, that illustrates
how and why to apply regression-discontinuity analysis. Discuss how the
analysis helps to answer pertinent questions about the example.
WEEK 8 DISS 1
"Evaluating Policy Performance"
Please respond to the following:
- Compare
and contrast methods of evaluation and prescription in terms of time and
the types of claims produced by each. Provide examples to support your
response.
- Assume
you are a program director who must propose an effective evaluation of
your program’s performance. Compare and contrast formative and summative
evaluation, and determine which one will provide performance information
that would be most useful to policy makers. Provide reasons and at least
one example to support your response.
WEEK 8 DISS 2
"Moral Judgment and Living Wage"
Please respond to the following:
- From
the e-Activity, select two different states and locations (city or county)
to compare the living wage estimates and poverty wage for a family with
one adult and one child designated for the two states and selected
locations. Make sure to find two states that have more than $2.00
difference in living wage estimates. Suggest at least two reasons for the
differences.
- From
the case study, Case 7.1., explain at least two reasons many consider the
adoption of a living wage a moral and ethical issue. Discuss the
implications that morality and ethics have to analyzing and developing
public policy.
WEEK 9 DISS 1
"Communicating Policy Analysis"
Please respond to the following:
- Assume
you are a candidate for a director of communications for a major
metropolitan county. The job will require you to communicate to the public
about public policy regarding transportation, environmental issues,
education, taxes, as well as economic development. Explain at least three
reasons and ways written and oral communication are important, and should
be used to ensure public policy analyses are promoted and accepted by the
general public.
- Use
the same scenario to explain at least two ways you would ensure public
policy analyses are read and accepted by key stakeholders. Provide two
reasons and an example to support your response.
WEEK 9 DISS 2
"Translating Policy Arguments"
Please respond to the following:
- Explain
at least two key factors policy makers use when evaluating and using
information provided to them in policy reports. Explain why it is
important for an analyst to know how policy makers evaluate and use
information.
- From
the case study, Case 9:1, highlight two key components a structured
written narrative for a policy issue paper or policy memo. Then propose at
least two benefits of developing a policy argument in this way. Provide an
example to support your response.
WEEK 10 DISS 1
"Planning Oral Briefings" Please
respond to the following:
- Assume
the governor has asked you to present an oral briefing on a controversial
environmental program to a board of commissioners of a major county in the
state. Three of the nine commissioners oppose the program and have experts
on their staff who generally accompany them to meetings. Recommend three
actions to take before the briefing and two key actions as you present the
recommendation. Provide reasons to support your response.
- Discuss
at least two possible advantages and two possible disadvantages to using
graphics and charts in oral briefings. Discuss the implications of these
advantages and disadvantages to the one responsible for communicating
public policy. Provide an example to support your response.
WEEK 10 DISS 2
"White House Briefings" Please
respond to the following:
- From
the e-Activity, summarize your first briefing. Based on your response to
Discussion 1, discuss whether your recommendations were notable. Provide
two to three examples to support your response.
- From
the e-Activity, compare and contrast the issues discussed in two briefings
you selected. Take a position on which oral briefing closely matches your
preferred style of communicating policy. Provide reasons to support your
response.
WEEK 11 DISS 1
"Process of Analysis and Structuring
Arguments" Please respond to the following:
- Discuss
at least two benefits to structuring arguments before and while developing
written documents.
- Highlight
at least two concepts or skills of public policy analysis you learned in
this class and that you believe you can apply in your current or future
career.
WEEK 11 DISS 2
"Challenges" Please respond to the
following:
- Discuss
at least two major challenges you believe public policy analysts face in
today’s political environment and propose at least one way to deal with
each challenge.
- Discuss
at least two major challenges you believe public policy analysts will face
in the next 10 to 20 years and propose at least one way to deal with each
challenge.
No comments:
Post a Comment